Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 34 (2010) 1105–1122
Introduction:
- Different crises exhibit themselves differently in terms of depth and length
- Forecasting the depth and length of the crises is hard
- The outcome of complicated combination of internal dynamics and external shocks
- Financial crises has a fundamental endogenous or internal origin where exogenous or external shocks only serve as triggering factors
- Heterogeneous agent model (HAM)
- Group crisis into three different types according to their depth and length - sudden crisis, smooth crisis and disturbing crisis
Model the three types of crises within the same deterministic HAM Building upon:
- the heterogeneous beliefs and the market-maker framework of Day and Huang (1990)
- the evolutionary framework of Brock and Hommes (1998)
- the discount mechanism of Lux and Marchesi (1999, 2000)
- the excess demand formation of Gennotte and Leland (1990) (with aggregate risk tolerance)
- in terms of the multi-phase belief system and the discounted expected profit from investors’ forward-looking behavior
Normalize the aggregate excess demand with the weighted sum of all investor groups’ risk tolerance
γ measures the adjustment speed of the price
- The interacting heterogeneous agent model (HAM) is capable of generating three typical types of financial crises that fit into real financial series.
- First, the three different types of crises could be endogenous due to internal price dynamics.
- Second, market structure, measured by market fraction index, is the key in price dynamics.
- Third, although we do show that the fundamentalists play an important role in triggering crises, they do not take on full responsibility.
- The chartists could be responsible in some scenarios such as smooth and disturbing crises.
沒有留言:
張貼留言